AN UNBIASED VIEW OF RESPONSIBILITY OF FINDER OF GOODS CASE LAWS

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

Blog Article

33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives in the police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.

The main objectives of police is usually to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all make sure law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender as well as the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only carried out In case the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these an appeal has not nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then search for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. Within the meantime police shall remain neutral while in the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of the individuals is indulged in criminal exercise the police shall acquire prompt action against them under legislation. five. The moment petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

During the United States, consumers are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their have can remember just one rule of thumb when it involves referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as is possible, leading the court, not only on the case, but towards the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.

eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this can be a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents in the boy or girl will not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by legislation.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It's also a effectively-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.

500,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) Every single and the same shall be kept inside the police station towards the effect that no harm shall be caused for the petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more

As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to both party and the case shall be decided with the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more

The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to the tradition that the reader should be capable of deduce the logic from the decision plus the statutes.[four]

Because of their position between the two main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of legislation.

The learned Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced because of the findings inside the Impugned order, after recording read more of evidence of the respective parties. Read more

Report this page